.png)
When Should You Transition Your India Team From EOR to Entity?
Most companies ask us this question around headcount 18 to 25, not before, and rarely much after. That is the point where the math on an Employer of Record starts working against you instead of for you. Below roughly 15 employees, EOR fees, usually 8 to 15 percent of gross payroll, cost less than running local compliance yourself. Above 25, that same fee structure often costs more per year than a Private Limited entity's full running cost, including a dedicated local HR hire. If you are timing when to transition your India team from EOR to Entity, that crossover point is the real signal, not a date on a calendar.
Why Do Companies Delay Moving From EOR to a Local Entity?
Foreign companies hiring in India almost always start with an EOR, for good reason. Setting up a Private Limited company under the Companies Act, 2013 involves DIN and DSC issuance, SPICe+ filing, PAN and TAN allotment, GST registration, and opening a corporate bank account, a process that realistically takes 6 to 10 weeks. An EOR partner can put your first Bengaluru or Pune hire on payroll within 5 to 7 business days, so for a team still validating the location, speed wins.
The problem is that this decision gets made once and never revisited. We regularly meet companies still running an Employer of Record (EOR) at 35, even 60 employees, two or three years in, not because it is cheaper, but because nobody owns the decision to change it. The current wave of GCC formation in Bengaluru has sharpened this. US and European SaaS and fintech companies are opening India hubs to build AI, platform, and cloud infrastructure teams, and most start with EOR for the first 10 to 15 hires before formalising. Setting a headcount trigger in advance saves a scramble later.
Which Indian Cities Offer the Deepest Talent Once You Have an Entity?
Your entity structure directly changes which Indian talent pool you can hire from. EOR arrangements work fine for individual contributor roles in Bengaluru, Pune, Hyderabad, and Chennai, the four cities with the deepest bench of engineers already comfortable working under foreign payroll structures.
What gets harder under an EOR is senior leadership hiring, equity grants, and any role that needs to sign contracts or hold IP on the company's behalf. Director and VP level candidates, especially from established product companies or global GCCs, increasingly ask whether a role sits on an Indian entity or an EOR payroll before engaging seriously. At that seniority, it signals whether the company is genuinely committed to India or still testing the water.
Contract hiring through an EOR suits short project cycles, specialised AI or cloud migration work, or speed without a long-term local commitment. Full-time hiring, once you have an entity, works better for core product engineering, team leadership, and any role where you want institutional knowledge built over years, not months.
What Indian Law Applies When You Transition Your India Team From EOR to Entity?
An EOR in India operates under the state specific Shops and Establishments Act and handles statutory contributions under the Employees' Provident Fund Act, 1952 and the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, acting as the legal employer on your behalf. The moment you incorporate, typically as a Private Limited company under the Companies Act, 2013, and structured under FEMA and RBI foreign investment rules, your own entity becomes the legal employer and all of those obligations transfer to you directly.
The most expensive mistake we see is transitioning employees without carrying over EPF and gratuity continuity. Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, gratuity depends on continuous service. If the move is processed as a termination and rehire instead of a structured transfer, employees can lose accrued gratuity standing, and companies can trigger settlement liabilities nobody budgeted for.
The cleaner path is a formal novation of employment contracts stating continuity of service explicitly, reflected correctly in EPFO records. Getting this step right is usually what determines whether a transition from EOR to entity goes smoothly or turns into a dispute.
An EOR vs Entity Decision Table You Can Use Today
This table reflects the criteria we walk clients through before recommending a timeline. Save it as a starting checklist for your finance and legal teams.
Trigger | Stay on EOR | Move to Entity |
Headcount | Under 15 | 18 to 25 or more |
Time horizon in India | Under 12 months, still validating | 18 months or more, confirmed hub |
Annual EOR fee vs entity running cost | EOR fee is cheaper | EOR fee exceeds roughly 45 to 60 lakh rupees a year |
Equity grants for Indian employees | Not required yet | Required, EOR complicates direct grants |
Senior hiring | Occasional individual contributor roles | Hiring Director level or above |
IP ownership | Acceptable short term under EOR | Needs to sit directly with your company |
Local vendor and banking needs | None | GST invoicing, local contracts, banking required |
If four or more rows point toward the entity column, start incorporation immediately, since the 6 to 10 week timeline means it will not be operational for two months regardless of when you begin.
How AnjuSmriti Global Manages This Transition, With a Real Example
Our standard process to transition your India team from EOR to Entity runs in three phases. A two week readiness audit checks headcount, contract terms, and EPF or gratuity continuity gaps. A six to eight week window handles incorporation and novation drafting while the EOR relationship stays active. A final one to two week cutover transfers employment with zero payroll gap.
A mid sized US fintech client, roughly 200 employees globally with a 22 person India pod built entirely through EOR, came to us after their monthly EOR invoice hit nearly 38,000 dollars and finance started asking why India headcount cost more per engineer than their US team. During the audit, we found six employees with gratuity gaps from an earlier provider switch processed as a termination instead of a transfer.
We renegotiated those agreements with explicit continuity language before finalising the entity, adding three weeks but avoiding a real dispute. The entity went live in nine weeks, per employee cost dropped roughly 34 percent, and the client used the savings to add four more senior engineers.
Contract Hiring vs Full-Time Hiring After You Set Up an Entity
Once your entity is live, the choice between contract and full-time hiring becomes more deliberate rather than a default. Contract hiring still makes sense for defined scope work, such as a six month cloud migration or a specific AI integration project. Full-time hiring fits better for roles tied to your core product, anyone managing a local team, and any position where continuity matters more than short term flexibility. Companies that keep both options open, rather than defaulting entirely to one model, tend to build more resilient India teams.
What Does It Cost to Run an India Team on EOR vs Your Own Entity?
For a 20 person mid to senior engineering team in Bengaluru, here is the real comparison at approximate current rates. Mid level engineers with three to five years experience run 14 to 20 lakh rupees a year, senior engineers with six to nine years run 24 to 35 lakh, and leads or architects with ten or more years run 38 to 55 lakh.
On an EOR, add 8 to 15 percent of gross payroll as the management fee, on top of statutory employer contributions. For a 20 person team averaging 28 lakh CTC, that typically adds 67 to 105 lakh rupees a year in fees alone.
Running your own Private Limited entity costs roughly 1.5 to 3 lakh rupees for one time incorporation, plus ongoing payroll and accounting of about 50,000 to 80,000 rupees a month, plus a local HR hire at roughly 12 to 18 lakh a year if you do not already have one, or a HR outsourcing partner to cover the gap. For the same 20 person team, total entity running cost usually lands between 18 and 28 lakh a year, well under the EOR fee alone. Most clients reinvest the difference into additional headcount or a dedicated local engineering manager, a role that is genuinely hard to hire well for under an EOR structure.
Conclusion
Expect the EOR to entity crossover point to shift slightly earlier, closer to 15 employees than 20, as GCC formation and demand for local AI, cloud, and platform engineering talent push more mid market companies to formalise faster. In live mandates right now, more companies are building the transition trigger into their original India hiring plan from day one instead of treating it as a reactive decision finance flags a year later. If you are working out when to transition your India team from EOR to Entity, model it against your real headcount and seniority mix, and revisit that math every couple of quarters as you scale.
Interesting Reads:
FAQs
1.Does gratuity carry over when we move employees from EOR to our own India entity?
It can, but only if handled correctly. Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, gratuity depends on continuous service, so treating the move as a resignation and rehire resets the clock and can cost employees years of accrued standing. A formal novation agreement stating continuity of service explicitly, reflected accurately in EPFO records, protects employee entitlements and avoids disputes once the transition is underway.
2.What entity type should we set up, Private Limited or Branch Office?
Most foreign companies building an engineering or GCC team choose a Private Limited company under the Companies Act, 2013, since it allows full operational control, direct employment, and IP ownership. A Branch Office is generally restricted to limited permitted activities and is not built for large scale local hiring, so it rarely fits companies planning to grow an India engineering team long term.
3.How long does the transition from EOR to entity usually take?
Based on recent transitions, 8 to 10 weeks end to end is realistic, covering incorporation, PAN and TAN allotment, GST registration, and bank account opening with a newly formed entity. We recommend keeping the EOR relationship fully active until the entity completes its first successful payroll cycle, rather than cutting over on a fixed calendar date that assumes nothing will slip.
4.Can we offer stock options to Indian employees while still on an EOR?
Technically yes, but it gets complicated. Since the EOR entity, not your company, is the legal employer, equity documentation has to work around that relationship, and Indian tax treatment on exercise and sale is harder to administer cleanly across two separate legal entities. Most companies wait until the entity is live to simplify equity grants, especially for senior hires who expect options as part of the offer.
5.What is the biggest financial trigger for switching from EOR to entity?
Compare total annual EOR fees against the fully loaded cost of running your own entity, including a local HR hire and ongoing compliance costs. For most teams, that crossover happens between 18 and 25 employees, sometimes earlier if the team skews senior, since EOR fees scale directly with total payroll size rather than headcount alone.
6.Do we need a resident director to incorporate a company in India?
Yes. Under the Companies Act, 2013, at least one director must be a resident of India, defined as someone who stayed in the country for at least 182 days in the previous calendar year. Companies often meet this requirement through a senior local hire, a trusted advisor, or a nominee director arrangement handled by their legal partner.
7.What happens to leave balances and benefits when employees move to entity payroll?
Accrued leave, notice periods, and other employment terms should carry over under the novation agreement rather than resetting to zero. This must be explicitly stated in the transfer documentation and reflected accurately in the new entity's HR system before cutover, since silently losing leave balances is one of the fastest ways to damage trust with a team you want to retain.
8.Should we keep payroll outsourced even after setting up our own India entity?
Many companies do, and it is a reasonable choice. Running EPF, ESI, professional tax, and TDS compliance correctly in house requires expertise a 20 to 30 person team usually does not need to build right away. This differs from an EOR, since your entity remains the legal employer either way, but it reduces the operational load of the transition considerably.
Comments